英国社会学作业代写 分析的产生
这种分析的产生和发展提供了不同的结论，如我们在剧中的对话中始终对格里希格言的蔑视，从而导致了文本中反讽的产生和引入，作为一种创造幽默的机制。另外，喜剧的创作也是基于讽刺的引入，讽刺作为一种非常有用的资源在这类电视节目中。有其他学者认为,格赖斯的格言和喜剧无法联系,比如利兹,州格赖斯的合作原则不拨款喜剧:“不站起来的证据真实语言使用”,这项研究的结果不仅是调查格赖斯的格言,但发现破裂的选择为了创建喜剧的电视节目和其他喜剧。质量这一准则在这次展览中受到了最大的蔑视。关系格律在座谈小组的许多回应中被藐视，产生了《剧本反对法》。小组成员的回答不一致，违反了数量原则。在某些情况下，提供的信息比需要的多，或提供的信息比需要的少。最后，当小组成员给出不恰当或不有效的答案时，行为准则就会受到蔑视。总之,喜剧的创作或滑稽的情况有时取决于违反或抑制格赖斯的格言,可以取代等元素的引入讽刺,讽刺或隐喻,所以提出了认为格赖斯的格言是不可避免的在我们的日常对话或演讲,但没有格言不可替代或不可侵犯的和一些滑稽的元素需要这种违反或无视格赖斯的格言。
英国社会学作业代写 分析的产生
The creation and development of this analysis provided different conclusions, such us the flouting of Gricean Maxims throughout the conversation in the show, which caused the creation and introduction of the irony in the text, as a mechanism to create humour. In addition, the creation of comedy is also based on the introduction of sarcasm, that as the irony, it is a very useful resource in this kind of TV shows.There are other scholars that considered that Grice’s maxims and comedy are not able to be linked, such as Leeds, that states that Grice’s cooperative principle is not appropriated for comedy: “does not stand up to the evidence of real language use” .The result of this research is not only investigating the rupture of Grice’s maxims but discover which are the alternatives in order to create comedy in this kind of TV shows and in other comedies. The Maxim of Quality is flouted the most in the show. The Relation Maxim is flouted in many responses in the panel, creating the Script Opposition Act. The Maxim of Quantity is violated through the incongruencies of panellist’s answers. In some cases, giving more information than needed or giving less information that is required. And finally, Maxim of Manner is flouted when panellists give answers that are not appropriate or efficient.To sum up, the creation of comedy or humoristic situations sometimes depends on the violation or suppression of Grice’s Maxims, which could be substituted by the introduction of elements such as irony, sarcasm or metaphors, so it is inevitable to think that Grice’s Maxims are presented in our daily conversations or speeches, but there are not maxims that are irreplaceable or inviolable and some comical elements require of this violation or flouting Grice’s Maxims.
